// you’re reading...

elsternwick, films and cinemas, under $20

NOT: The Boys are Back

The Boys are Back is director Scott Hick’s (Shine) latest film about family, fatherhood and boys. The movie is based on ‘The Boys are Back in Town’ the 2001 memoir of The Independent columnist Simon Carr, and it was shot on location in South Australia, turned into an almost unrecognisable romantic landscape of swaying golden grass and winding seaside roads.

Clive Owen plays Joe Warr, a sportswriter who finds himself a single father of a six-year old boy and a teenager from a previous marriage. It’s a typical fish-out-of-water story as this ramshackle family raise themselves without any rules or feminine influence and with the reckless philosophy of ‘just say yes’.

The film held all the promise of an engaging story about the conflict, sadness and joys of family life, but it just didn’t grab me. I was trying to work out why and my conclusion was that I felt that the storyline and the characters lacked truth. I didn’t believe that Joe would feel quasi-sexual tension with pretty single mum Laura and sexy barmaid Mia, mere months after his wife’s death. I didn’t believe that any semi-responsible parent would ask an almost complete stranger to take care of his kids. I didn’t believe that the teenage Harry would choose to move thousands of kilometres away from his friends and upbringing in England in order to live in the South Australian bush. And the scenes where Joe’s dead wife comes back in visions to talk to Joe? Puh-lease.

For a film which is basically about a study in humanity, I think The Boys are Back failed. No doubt the critics will disagree with me – the film received an 8-minute standing ovation at the Toronto International Film Festival. My movie date buddy Lena also loved it, tearing up for most of the film. So which way do you fall – HOT or NOT?

pixel NOT: The Boys are Back

Discussion

2 comments for “NOT: The Boys are Back”

  1. Joyce, The movie rang true for me. I thought that it was beautifully crafted in so many respects.

    The lead character would not be particularly likeable to some. But I think that his recklessness and inability to cope, following his wife’s death, was entirely human.

    With respect to the other women characters, I saw it as there being an attraction but not a significant one. Men, after all, seem to have a separate way of perceiving sexual attraction that falls beyond their emotional circumstances.

    Essentially I think that Joe’s flaws and mistakes were the central theme of this picture. That his elder son would choose to go somewhere he felt he was wanted and felt loved more, did not surprise me. After all don’t many of us look to find a place where we feel we truly belong?

    Posted by stickifingers | October 30, 2009, 12:07 am
    • Hi Stickifingers

      Since the screening I have been pondering whether I was unduly harsh in my review – perhaps my criticisms were just because I wasn’t in the mood for that sort of movie that night. Fickle Jetsetting Joyce! So thanks for your comment, it’s good to get another point of view as I suspect I’m probably in the minority.

      Jetsetting Joyce

      Posted by Jetsetting Joyce | October 30, 2009, 9:15 am

Post a comment

Twitter ID
(ID only. No links or "@" symbols)

Welcome to MEL: HOT OR NOT

The decisive guide to Melbourne

Reviews of what's HOT and NOT in the city.

Recent Posts

HOT: Sweet Evelyn, 128 Union St, Brunswick
August 29, 2014
The Age Good Food Guide 2015 award winners
August 25, 2014
HOT: The Rusty Fox, 501 Macaulay Rd, Kensington
August 22, 2014
HOT: Olivigna, 54-56 Brumbys Road, Warrandyte South
August 20, 2014

Click for more in Archives

Get in touch

Want to say hello, ask questions, give feedback, advertise on the site? Email me at joyce@melhotornot.com

LIKE me on Facebook

We’re featured in LonelyPlanet.com

I'm a featured blogger on Lonely Planet
MEL: HOT OR NOT - The decisive guide to Melbourne Melbourne restaurants

Twitter Updates

    Categories

    Editorial policy

    Get Adobe Flash player